To the editor:
Unitary Executive Theory (UET) posits that Article II of the US Constitution establishes a ‘unitary executive,’ concentrating executive power in the President.
The ‘Take Care Clause’ in Article II Section 3 states that the President ‘shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,’ mandating that the President execute laws passed by Congress. This clause, however, is subject to varying interpretations regarding the scope of presidential discretion in interpreting and implementing laws, a key point of contention.
Proponents of the UET argue that this clause grants the President broad authority. However, this view is contested, with some arguing that Congress retains significant power to structure the administrative state, particularly in areas where agency independence has traditionally been valued.
We the people must be informed of the three co-equal branches of our government — legislative, executive, and judicial— and expect that each respects the others’ constitutional roles, upholding the separation of powers upon which our democracy rests. This includes a clear understanding of the debates surrounding executive power, such as abuse of the Unitary Executive Theory, and its potential implications for the balance of authority among the branches.
This allows all of us to enjoy a “safe, healthy, and free life.”
Bear Down, and God Help Us All.
Rob Franzo Leelanau Township
